This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Unreviewed patches
- From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>,Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2003 21:12:44 -0700
- Subject: Re: Unreviewed patches
- References: <20030602124040.A13397@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <20030603005805.GF25928@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:58:05PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 12:40:40PM -0400, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-05/msg00741.html
>
> Since I think I suggested PT_GNU_STACK in the first place,
> I'm a bit biased, but I like this solution. It's the least
> amount of work for the kernel in execing a new application
> short of having a dedicated ET_FLAGS bit (which we don't).
>
> The patch is ok.
>
I like the proposal. But I don't like the implementation.
I'd like to see a generic note section for properties of
a relocatable file. I will make a detailed suggestion
tomorrow.
H.J.