This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: What is the blessed version of autoconf/automake?
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: Michael Meissner <bin-mail at the-meissners dot org>,binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 13:25:56 -0400
- Subject: Re: What is the blessed version of autoconf/automake?
- References: <20030529170544.GA1368@tiktok.the-meissners.org>
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 01:05:44PM -0400, Michael Meissner wrote:
> What is the prefered version of automake, autoconf, gettext, and libtool for
> the binary utilities these days? In README-maintainer-mode it mentions that I
> should use the special version of the tools in sourceware.cygnus.com (which I
> probably should submit a patch because cygnus.com doesn't exist anymore). With
> this version of the tools, I get:
Where exactly did you get them, and are you sure you're using that
copy? They work for me.
>
> configure.in:8: AC_TRY_COMPILE was called before AC_ISC_POSIX
> configure.in:8: AC_TRY_RUN was called before AC_ISC_POSIX
> autoconf: Undefined macros:
> ***BUG in Autoconf--please report*** AC_FD_MSG
> ***BUG in Autoconf--please report*** AC_FD_CC
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer