This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: TOPLEVEL PATCH: accept more x86 variants

From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
To: kcook34 at ford dot com
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 10:44:40 -0400
Subject: Re: TOPLEVEL PATCH: accept more x86 variants
References: <3ec295fd.195c.1804289383@wideopenwest.com> <200305150020.h4F0Kbm25552@greed.delorie.com> <3EC3A421.5080603@ford.com>

> Although it seems ludicrous that somebody would design a character
> set where 0-9 were not consecutive, I also wouldn't have thought
> that somebody would have made one where "I" isn't next to "J",
> so ...

Yeah, stuff like that never fails to surprise me.

> 2003-05-15  Kelley Cook  <kelleycook@wideopenwest.com>
> 
> 	* configure.in: Accept i[3456789]86 for machine type.
> 	* config/acinclude.m4: Likewise.
> 	* etc/configure.texi: Likewise.
> 	* configure: Regenerate.

This is fine.  Please apply to both gcc and src repositories if you
can, or email me privately if you can't.

References:
- TOPLEVEL PATCH: accept more x86 variants
  - From: Kelley Cook
- Re: TOPLEVEL PATCH: accept more x86 variants
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: TOPLEVEL PATCH: accept more x86 variants
  - From: Kelley Cook

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]