This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 05:50:53PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2003 at 05:20:26PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > Michael found a bug between binutils and glibc. ld.so assumes the > > first symbol from the hash table is the oldest (default) version. > > Unfortunately, it is not always true. The question is if glibc > > should depend on it or ld should guarantee it. > > > > > > There are one glibc bug and one binutils bug. Both should take base > version into account. Here is the patch for binutils. H.J.
Attachment:
bfd-base.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |