This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Sat, May 10, 2003 at 01:50:13PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> >Thank you. That's all I wanted you to do. Binutils _already uses >files generated from frv CGEN input_. You can go look at it yourself, >in opcodes/. So if you're going to contribute a different version of >the file
I don't like the implication here.
If I were to contribute a version of a file that contains code changes that impact on other parts of FSF's binutils, I would indicate that up front.
Similarly, if I were to apply a license that in anyway varied from the GPL, I'll also indicate that up front.
However, since that was obviously the concern - and a reasonable one,
since you never phrased your patch in such a way as to say the copies were the same - then it behooves you to say that there are no changes.
Your message said nothing about acknowledging the copy of the code already in src. In fact, I remember you saying it actually came from an internal tree. The reason for my concern should be obvious.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |