This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Linking with -lc
- From: "Harris, Jeff" <JeffH at aiinet dot com>
- To: "'binutils at sources dot redhat dot com'" <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 14:54:55 -0400
- Subject: Linking with -lc
I am experiencing a strange linking problem since upgrading my binutils to
2.14.90.0.1. I have a GCC version 3.2.3 cross-compiler for powerpc with
soft floating point. I am using GLIBC 2.3.2.
I have a shared library which uses floating point operations. I build it
as:
powerpc-ai-linux-gcc -g fplib.c -shared -o libcfp.so
As a result, it defines __muldf3 as a local text symbol in libcfp.so.
If, however, I build it as:
powerpc-ai-linux-gcc -g fplib.c -shared -o libcfp.so -lc
The __muldf3 symbol is an undefined global symbol: __muldf3@@GLIBC_2.3.2.
This occurs whether I'm using the old (2.13.90.0.20) or new binutils. The
different symbol definitions are due to ld finding the __muldf3 symbol in
libgcc.a (the first case) or libc.so.6 (the second case)
My problem comes in linking a program against the libcfp.so library. If I
have a program which also uses soft floating point operations, the program
fails to link with the libcfp built with -lc:
/usr/local/ai/ppc8xx-lx2.4-1.00rc4/bin/powerpc-ai-linux-gcc -g fp1.c
-o cfp1 -L. -lcfp
./libcfp.so: undefined reference to `__muldf3@GLIBC_2.3.2'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
If I remove the -lc flag in the link of libcfp.so, the cfp1 program links
successfully. This situation also works in both cases using the
2.13.90.0.20 binutils. I can not use the 2.13 binutils due to a bug with ld
relating to printf statements and -O2 optimizations. The 2.14 version fixes
the ld crash.
It seems safe enough to remove -lc flag, but it is being added in some third
party packages which we are importing and would prefer not to have to
modify.
Is there anything I can do to fix this situation without modifying the
package? It seems like a bug in the loader or perhaps a deprecated feature.
I would appreciate any suggestions.
Thanks,
Jeff