Re: RFA: Fix readelf -wi test (Was: Re: readelf: apply all rela relocations in the debug_info section)

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>]

On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 05:41:32PM +0100, Joern Rennecke wrote:
> Nick Clifton wrote:
> > +     set sought {
> > +       ".*DW_TAG_compile_unit.*"
> > +       ".*DW_TAG_subprogram.*"
> > +       ".*DW_TAG_base_type.*"
> > +       ".*DW_AT_producer.*(GNU C|indirect string).*"
> > +       ".*DW_AT_language.*ANSI C.*"
> > +       ".*DW_AT_name.*(testprog.c|indirect string).*"
> > +       ".*DW_AT_name.*fn.*"
> > +       ".*DW_AT_name.*(main|indirect string).*"
> > +     }
> 
> Hello Nick,
> 
> At least for sh-elf, after the " \(indirect string, offset: 0x[0-9a-f]+\): "
> bit, it still displays the original string.  Are there any targets where
> this is not the case?

There should not be; if there are, it's a bug.  So I'd say the indirect
string bit can probably go.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer