This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: elfxx-ia64.c question
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 01:15:35PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> I was thinking of the case where a SECREL32 reloc is used against an
> undefined weak sym, and the base address of the section in question
> is located above 1<<32. Under those circumstances you'll get a
> reloc overflow. Same goes for dynamic syms (if such are allowed in
> SECREL relocs).
Maybe. But the only place that really uses this is debug info...
r~