This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: running configure without arguments?


On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 06:07:45PM +0100, Christian Jönsson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 01:02:48PM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > On Dec 31, 2002, Christian Jönsson <c.christian.joensson@telia.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Configuring in build-/libiberty
> > 
> > Have you by any chance regenerated the top-level configure with
> > autoconf 2.5x?  This would cause this kind of lossage.  The top level
> > requires autoconf 2.13 atm.
> 
> well, it's autoconf 2.57 I'm afraid, but I didn't myself issue the
> regeneration of configure, it was done "automatically", i.e., I simple
> issued a ../src/configure and then a make...
> 

hmm, I guess I have both 2.57 and 2.13 and some sort of wrapper...


chj@TOPPEN:/usr/local/src/gcc-binutils/trunk$ autoconf --version
autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.57
Written by David J. MacKenzie and Akim Demaille.

Copyright 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
--------------------------------------------------------
Autoconf version 2.13
--------------------------------------------------------
This is autoconf-wrapper, which will hand off execution
to one of the two real versions listed above, depending
on the contents of configure.in/configure.ac.  Since the
wrapper was called from within a directory in which those
files are not found, this generic 'version' message is
displayed.
chj@TOPPEN:/usr/local/src/gcc-binutils/trunk$

but now it's time for some celebration, cheers and happy new year!

/ChJ


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]