This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New Sanyo Stormy16 relocations


Doug Evans writes:
 >  > > But, if approval is required, methinks binutils is a better place to
 >  > > provide approval for .opc changes (e.g. complaints about warnings :-).
 >  > 
 >  > Better than sid?  Better than gdb?
 > 
 > I don't understand.  The context here is .opc. files.
 > Changes to .opc files don't affect sid or gdb.  Only binutils.

[flipping the pedantic bit]
Ok, gdb uses the disassembler.
Still, if src/opcodes is ok for binutils, I don't think
it's a problem for gdb or sid.
And if it is, the problem can be dealt with as it arises.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]