This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Andrew writes: > In C, there is zero and non-zero. There is no true or false. > > What ever the function's type, its the avoidance of: > > if (bfd_foo_p() == TRUE) > > that is important. s/There is no true or false./There is only false and !false./ I like bfd_boolean, though recognizing the pitfalls of foo_p() == TRUE is important. What if one didn't define TRUE and instead defined CANONICAL_TRUE?
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |