This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bfd/elf.c : bfd_seek to 0 valid ?

From: jeroen dobbelaere <jeroen dot dobbelaere at acunia dot com>
To: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2002 09:24:53 +0100
Subject: Re: bfd/elf.c : bfd_seek to 0 valid ?
Organization: ACUNIA
References: <200211071457.gA7EvfQ31077@pc960.cambridge.arm.com> <3DCA8295.5040106@acunia.com> <20021107223032.GF967@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>

Alan Modra wrote:

On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 04:11:17PM +0100, jeroen dobbelaere wrote:

I have the impression, that for some reason, the .rel.dyn section does not
get a fileposition assigned (resulting in the hdr->sh_offset == 0).

Where should this mapping to the output bfd happen ?


_bfd_elf_assign_file_positions_for_relocs

When I add a printf for the section name here (when one is available),
'.rel.dyn' does not show up here :(
Also, its shdr does not show up.
(But there are three headers at the end without
a bfd_section associated).

Another section which does show up here is '.rel.plt'.

This one is created right behind the '.rel.dyn' section (traced in 'bfd_make_section')...

Greetings,
--
Jeroen Dobbelaere
Embedded Software Engineer

ACUNIA Embedded Solutions
http://www.acunia.com/aes

References:
- Re: bfd/elf.c : bfd_seek to 0 valid ?
  - From: Richard Earnshaw
- Re: bfd/elf.c : bfd_seek to 0 valid ?
  - From: jeroen dobbelaere
- Re: bfd/elf.c : bfd_seek to 0 valid ?
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]