This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Change ELFOSABI in SH (Re: [Patch] sh64: Fix gas testsuite expectedoutput)


"H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:
>> So I guess that the ambiguity for existing objects can be handled by
>> adding something to bfd_check_format_matches which selects an appropriate
>> representative vector from the ambiguity set if possible, as it was
>> already done when the default vector is included in this set.
>> Thoughts?
> 
> Someone from SH should read
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-10/msg00437.html
> 
> The old one is very unreasonable. Do it now before it is too late. I
> can supply patches if necessary.

I'm not a one from SH :-)
Anyway, my argument about bfd_check_format_matches is for
"existing objects".

Regards,
	kaz


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]