This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [Patch] sh64: Fix gas testsuite expected output

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: Stephen Clarke <stephen dot clarke at earthling dot net>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:32:17 -0700
Subject: Re: [Patch] sh64: Fix gas testsuite expected output
References: <002e01c2749c$e15e2980$6301a8c0@wren> <20021015202723.B26432@lucon.org> <002701c274ce$0434cf50$6301a8c0@wren>

On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 09:39:29PM -0700, Stephen Clarke wrote:
> From: "H. J. Lu"
> Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2002 8:27 PM
> > 
> > That is not right. Something is wrong with ELF/SH. Can you tell me
> > the difference between elf32-sh64big-linux and elf32-sh64 in the
> > ELF header?
> 
> I can't: I don't think there is a difference in the ELF header.
> The same issue applies to non-sh64 targets,
> e.g.elf32-shl and elf32-sh-linux.
> 

Then, I have to ask, what are the differences between elf32-shl and
elf32-sh-linux? If you tell me that, I may come up with something.


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Patch] sh64: Fix gas testsuite expected output
  - From: Stephen Clarke

References:
- Re: [Patch] sh64: Fix gas testsuite expected output
  - From: Stephen Clarke
- Re: [Patch] sh64: Fix gas testsuite expected output
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: [Patch] sh64: Fix gas testsuite expected output
  - From: Stephen Clarke

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]