This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: bfd version

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 06:39:15 -0700
Subject: Re: bfd version
References: <20021014213414.E22176@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>

On Mon, Oct 14, 2002 at 09:34:14PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> bfd version and date strings are currently created by some black magic
> in bfd/configure and find their way into the build bfd/bfd.h.  This
> scheme unfortunately doesn't update the version unless you re-
> configure (or perhaps fortunately, as touching bfd.h causes many files
> to be recompiled).  So I've moved the version macros to version.h,
> and added some machinery to create a build copy.
> 

Thanks. I was wondering why I couldn't duplicate the ld failure
unless I did a configure.


H.J.

References:
- bfd version
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]