This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Future plans for gprof

From: Dan Kegel <dank at kegel dot com>
To: "Desmond, Colin" <DesmondC at logica dot com>, "'binutils at sources dot redhat dot com'" <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:30:26 -0700
Subject: Re: Future plans for gprof
References: <9BF54A52E1DFD311BC1000D0B73EADFE0C6D395A@bell.logica.co.uk> <3D665CA7.1ADF5E63@kegel.com>
Reply-to: dank at kegel dot com

Dan Kegel wrote:
> The problem is, gprof is partly in binutils, and partly in glibc.
> The glibc maintainer is very, very picky about what patches
> he'll accept.  In particular, he has not yet accepted the perfectly
> reasonable patch
>   http://www.kegel.com/gmon.patch
> which fixes support for large programs.  I haven't tried hard
> enough to get it accepted ...

OK, I got off my duff and filed a PR.  It's at
http://bugs.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view+audit-trail&pr=4379

That ought to move things along a bit...
- Dan

References:
- Future plans for gprof
  - From: Desmond, Colin
- Re: Future plans for gprof
  - From: Dan Kegel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]