This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: A new target for binutils ? MCS-51
- From: "ing. Radek Benedikt" <benedikt at lphard dot cz>
- To: "Stephane Brunet" <stephane dot brunet at polymtl dot ca>
- Cc: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 16:31:05 +0200
- Subject: RE: A new target for binutils ? MCS-51
- Reply-to: <benedikt at lphard dot cz>
Hi, this is done, but in this time not synchronised width current version of
binutils and merged to official binutils version.
See patch in Binutils news.
In this time I planned GCC port.
(and also I must also sign a legal document which officially assigns
copyright to the FSF. I thing, I am programmer,...)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephane Brunet [mailto:stephane.brunet@polymtl.ca]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 3:18 PM
> To: binutils@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: A new target for binutils ? MCS-51
>
>
> Hi!
>
> I am presently planning to port binutils (an then GCC) to the MCS-51
> target since many (old and recent) microcontrollers are using it.
>
> I have found old messages describing how to port binutils but I want to
> be sure that the information is up to date. Should I follow this order :
> BFD -> opcode -> gas -> ld ?
>
> Which object format should I choose ? COFF or ELF ? I tend to use ELF
> because the AVR port use it, but I have no other good reasons...
>
> Regards,
>
> Stéphane Brunet
>
> P.S. : I was very surprised when I first read the source code : this is
> the first time that I see a complete K&R-written C project! Perhaps am I
> too young!
>
>
>