This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Don't warn defintion overrides indirect versioned symbol

On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 08:57:23PM +0200, Franz Sirl wrote:
> On Freitag, 9. August 2002 03:55, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 08, 2002 at 10:49:07AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > This is for
> > >
> > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-08/msg00108.html
> >
> > If there is no objection in the next few hours, I will check it in
> > along with the testcase tonight.
> 
> I hope this doesn't silence the libgcc_s vs glibc warning, which seems 
> perfectly valid to me?
> 

It will. For one thing, ld.so won't complain. Why should ld? Please
see my testcase.


H.J.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]