This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: redefining dynamic symbols??? -- why I want to.

From: "Jorge Luis Williams" <jorgew at cs dot uidaho dot edu>
To: <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: <jorgew at cs dot uidaho dot edu>, <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>, <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 08:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: redefining dynamic symbols??? -- why I want to.
References: <27403.134.20.8.20.1026873269.squirrel@www.jlwg.net> <20020717091854.GA30362@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <49185.67.250.109.250.1026910192.squirrel@www.jlwg.net> <20020717130444.GE30362@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <49197.67.250.109.250.1026913884.squirrel@www.jlwg.net> <20020717075853.A10247@lucon.org>

> Try
>
> # gcc -o exe_a .... -l_c
> # gcc -shared -Wl,-Bsymbolic -o lib_b.so .... -l_c
>
> It should work. If not, file a bug report with a small testcase.
>

I'm sorry, what is -l_c supposed to do -- I have my linker looking for a
library _c??  Or is it a compilation flag??
jOrGe W.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: redefining dynamic symbols??? -- why I want to.
  - From: H. J. Lu

References:
- redefining dynamic symbols???
  - From: Jorge Luis Williams
- Re: redefining dynamic symbols???
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: redefining dynamic symbols???
  - From: Jorge Luis Williams
- Re: redefining dynamic symbols???
  - From: Alan Modra
- redefining dynamic symbols??? -- why I want to.
  - From: Jorge Luis Williams
- Re: redefining dynamic symbols??? -- why I want to.
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]