This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: libtool / GCC 3.2 question and patch
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: "sje at cup dot hp dot com" <sje at cup dot hp dot com>, "binutils at sources dot redhat dot com" <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>, "gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 14 Jun 2002 06:08:51 -0300
- Subject: Re: libtool / GCC 3.2 question and patch
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <169330000.1023997801@warlock.codesourcery.com>
On Jun 13, 2002, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> --On Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:13:46 PM -0700 Steve Ellcey
> <sje@cup.hp.com> wrote:
>> Since the deadline for "big changes" is coming up on GCC 3.2, can I
>> assume that the libtools used for GCC 3.2 is not going to be updated to
>> use the libtools top of tree?
> I'd rather we move to the newer libtool, if we can, but I'll let Alexandre
> make a decision on this one.
This would be tricky, because IIRC a newer libtool would require a
newer autoconf and a newer automake. I've started playing with them
in the context of GCC a few weeks ago, ran into some problems but
never got as far as fixing them, so, let's go with Steve's patches for
now.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer