This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Use stabs for Linux/mips (Re: binutils is broken on ELF/MIPS)


On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 08:28:13PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 11:01:22PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 07:51:13PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 09:40:00PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 06:03:51PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 05:48:14PM -0700, Eric Christopher wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I tried a dirty, quick change enclosed. I still can't use gdb 5.2 to
> > > > > > > debug gcc 3.1.1 on Linux/mipsel. I don't think it is a good idea to
> > > > > > > make gcc 3.1.1 generate unusable debug info by default.. 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Definitely not a huge fan of that patch. I have another one from Matt
> > > > > > Green (attached) that I'm not ecstatic about either, but also seems to
> > > > > > work. The correct answer is to make dwarf-2 work under mips. It may
> > > > > > require some reworking though.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Does it really make dwarf-2 work? Does it break MIPS_STABS_ELF?
> > > > 
> > > > It should, without breaking or affecting MIPS_STABS_ELF at all.
> > > > 
> > > > Eric, why don't you like it - or rather, what else do you think "making
> > > > dwarf-2 work under MIPS" means?  I think that was the only missing
> > > > detail.
> > > 
> > > Well, binutils is currently broken on Linux/mips when gcc 3.1.1 is
> > > used as I have reported.  How can you tell dwarf-2 works on mips?
> > > I really like to see the whole thing get fixed. That is gcc 3.1.1
> > > works on Linux/mips and binutils, including readelf, works with
> > > gcc 3.1.1.
> > 
> > Well, it definitely fixes a problem.  What else is wrong?  I won't have
> > time to set up a toolchain for another few days.
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-06/msg00020.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-06/msg00036.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-06/msg00040.html
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-06/msg00047.html

Yes, I've read this entire thread, which I've been participating in. 
All of the problems in those messages you've found solutions for; I was
asking if anything else was still broken.  If so, then we just need to
keep iterating.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]