This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] purge obseleted configurations, top level


On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 03:29:38PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> Sorry, these are still supported by binutils.
OK.  I sent this in on the advice that if I couldn't find any
references to these being particularly supported as binutils-only
targets, I could assume they weren't.  Now I have that information.

Incidentally, these are now very unlucky little targets, being, I
believe, unsupported by gcc and gdb; and none of them,
according to configure.in, is supported by all of binutils.  Must be fun
targets to work on. :-P

Are these publically available lists anywhere of what is supported
by what parts of binutils, for future reference?

> > 2002-05-27  Nathanael Nerode  <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
> > 	* configure.in: Purge some obselete configurations.
> >
> > -   arm-*-riscix*)
-- no ld.
> > -   m68k-apollo-*)
-- no ld, 'binutils', gprof, libgloss
> > -   mips*-dec-bsd*)
-- no gprof, libgloss
> > -   mips*-*-bsd*)
-- no gprof, libgloss
> >     romp-*-*)
-- no bfd, 'binutils', ld, gas, opcodes, or libgloss (!)
> > +     # should be deleted after GCC 3.2 unless support is reenabled

Romp seems genuinely unsupported; am I right about this one?

--Nathanael


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]