This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: bfd.h installation location
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:45:44AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 04:54:15PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 07:26:50AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 08:52:06AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But please don't change anything under /usr/lib, /usr/include,
> > > > /export/tools/mipsel-linux/include, /export/tools/mipsel-linux/lib,
> > > > where host == target.
> > >
> > > If you re-read the proposal, you'll see that no one is suggesting
> > > a change when host == target.
> > >
> >
> > What is b) in
> >
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-05/msg00334.html
>
> b) install normally when host == target ...
>
> Hmm, I guess "install normally" isn't particularly clear. I mean
> install as we currently do, that is, libbfd.a, bfd.h etc. continue to
> be installed to their current locations, without any name changes.
It doesn't help when --enable-shared is used. I don't mind
libbfd-target-version.so myself.
H.J.