This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[davem@redhat.com: Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :(]


Is someone here trying to look into what Dave is saying here?

Cheers,

/ChJ

----- Forwarded message from "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> -----

Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 02:41:47 -0700 (PDT)
To: christian@j-son.org
Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: v8.S dwarf2 eh frame issues again :(
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>

   From: Christian Jönsson <christian@j-son.org>
   Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:45:34 +0200

   On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 02:32:01AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
   
   > Not at all, java bugs are not qualified as regressions that can hold
   > up 3.1 being released.
   
   OK, is this issue constrained to java or might it have broader impact?

The v8.S libffi issue is constrained to java.

The dwarf unwind info misoptimization in binutils can impact any
platform, but that is a binutils bug in eh_frame optimization and
should not hold up the 3.1 gcc release.

----- End forwarded message -----


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]