This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:05:14AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 06:40:57PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 05:31:40PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 11:48:35PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > > > > On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 09:45:53PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote: > > > > > The issue is ELF/alpha allocates more relocation entries for ld.so than > > > > > needed. > > > > > > > > But why? It is already trying to compute exactly how many > > > > are needed. > > > > > > > > > > I am enclosing a testcase here. You need an alpha gcc which supports > > > string merge to duplcate it. I included .o files in my tarball so that > > > you can duplcate with a cross binutils. > > > > > > # make > > > gcc -fPIC -O -c x.c > > > gcc -fPIC -O -c y.c > > > ld -r -m elf64alpha x.o y.o > > > ld -m elf64alpha -O1 -shared -o bad.so a.out -z nocombreloc > > > rm -f a.out > > > readelf -r bad.so | grep NONE > > > 000000000000 000000000000 R_ALPHA_NONE > > > 0000000000000000 > > > ld -m elf64alpha -O1 -shared -o good.so x.o y.o -z nocombreloc > > > readelf -r good.so | grep NONE > > > make: *** [all] Error 1 > > > > > > > I think this patch > > > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-11/msg00580.html > > > > generated R_ALPHA_NONE. Jakub, can you take a look at it? > > I'll look at it hopefully today. > This patch seems to fix alpha. But ia64 is still broken. H.J.
Attachment:
bfd-merge.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |