This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: m68k-elf-as
- From: "Aaron J. Grier" <aaron at frye dot com>
- To: Peter Barada <pbarada at mail dot wm dot sps dot mot dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 14:54:42 -0800
- Subject: Re: m68k-elf-as
- References: <412A28C967692A438B59223143A7268FE1B13F@ALTAIR.endevco.com> <200203141913.g2EJDRA10087@hyper.wm.sps.mot.com>
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 02:13:27PM -0500, Peter Barada wrote:
> > >How would I have found that? It's not in the MCF5272UM.
> > >"m68k-elf-as --help" doesn't mention it. A Google search for
> > >"m68k-elf-as rambar0" comes up empty. What document am I missing?
> >
> >rambar is not the correct name for the coldfire series. It's
> >actually rambar0:
>
> What I should have said is "rambar is not the correct name of the
> 'rambar' register in the GNU assembler. rambar0 is what you want."
>
> To find it, you have to look at the gnu assembler sources (in the
> binutils package). See http:/sourceware.cygnus.com/binutils/ for a
> pointer to the source.
could these details be added to the M68K-Dependent section of the gas
documentation? (alternately, would anyone complain if a diff showed
up?)
it seems kind of rediculous to have to defer to the source for such
basic concepts as register naming conventions.
--
Aaron J. Grier | Frye Electronics, Tigard, OR | aaron@frye.com
"In a few thousand years people will be scratching their heads
wondering how on earth the first computer was invented and
bootstrapped without a prior computer to do it with."
-- Chris Malcolm, on comp.arch