This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>] problem with unwind info for .init/.fini sections
- From: David Mosberger <davidm at napali dot hpl dot hp dot com>
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com, Ulrich Drepper <drepper at redhat dot com>, GNU libc hacker <libc-hacker at sources dot redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 17:43:07 -0800
- Subject: Re: [David Mosberger <davidm@hpl.hp.com>] problem with unwind info for .init/.fini sections
- References: <m3g03lfd1g.fsf@myware.mynet><20020228165851.A26168@lucon.org><15486.55079.333535.999190@napali.hpl.hp.com><20020228173311.A26728@lucon.org>
- Reply-to: davidm at hpl dot hp dot com
>>>>> On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 17:33:11 -0800, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> said:
HJ> I believe glibc is ok. The problem is binutils. I didn't see any
HJ> supports for DT_INIT_ARRAY, DT_FINI_ARRAY. DT_INIT_ARRAYSZ,
HJ> DT_FINI_ARRAYSZ, DT_PREINIT_ARRAY nor DT_PREINIT_ARRAYSZ.
Shouldn't this be easy straight-forward to add?
I guess the other component that needs updating is gcc (at least the
ia64 versions of crtbegin.asm and crtend.asm would need that). I'd be
happy to work on this.
--david