This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH RFA] More stdbool.h fallout

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
Cc: rth at redhat dot com, dje at transmeta dot com, thorpej at wasabisystems dot com,binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 22:30:42 -0500
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFA] More stdbool.h fallout
References: <20020201144806.D8324@dr-evil> <15451.14004.496452.354716@casey.transmeta.com> <20020201172354.A10953@redhat.com> <200202020129.g121TCI21670@envy.delorie.com>

On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 08:29:12PM -0500, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > How about editing bfd.h (or one of its precursors like bfd-3.in)
> > based on what autoconf finds?  Thus no ifdefing in the result,
> > and thus we avoid the afeared losage.
> 
> That won't work if bfd.h is installed in an include directory shared
> by many targets.

I don't think this is a problem... we do some configury into bfd.h, it
is target-specific, it just can't depend on config.h because it can be
included by programs with arbitrary contents of config.h.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH RFA] More stdbool.h fallout
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

References:
- [PATCH RFA] More stdbool.h fallout
  - From: Jason R Thorpe
- [PATCH RFA] More stdbool.h fallout
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [PATCH RFA] More stdbool.h fallout
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [PATCH RFA] More stdbool.h fallout
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]