This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Possibly unnecessary differences in messages
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>
- To: Philipp Thomas <pthomas at suse dot de>
- Cc: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com, Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 13:56:54 +0000
- Subject: Re: Possibly unnecessary differences in messages
- Organization: ARM Ltd.
- Reply-to: Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com
> * Richard Earnshaw (rearnsha@arm.com) [20020129 19:35]:
>
> > > so, the messages should be identical, and the only question would be which
> > > of the two should be used.
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Damn, I should have been more precise ;-) Which wording should I use?
> 'because the non-interworking code in %s has been copied into it' or
> 'because non-interworking code in %s has been linked with it' ?
>
> To me at least the second looks like the better choice.
Agreed.
R.