This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: MIPS md_apply_fix()(?) problem.


On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 07:35:26PM -0800, cgd@broadcom.com wrote:
> "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
> > On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 06:27:14PM -0800, cgd@broadcom.com wrote:
> > > "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:
> > > > I don't understand what you meant. I just compiled the test you
> > > > provided.
> > > 
> > > again, _with what version of tools_?
> > 
> > Today's CVS as of 6:50pm PST.
> 
> I poked at the flags a bit more, and with -G 0 the current sources
> assemble the code fragment correctly.
> 
> Without -G 0 they do not.
> 
> (I'm pretty sure that with the source date I was starting with,
> neither did, but that's not particularly important at this point.
> I just looked at the changelogs, and it looks like the code which
> makes -G 0 work came in in rev 1.82 of tc-mips.c, which was committed
> at 2001/10/10 01:08:35 (UTC).  I had started with 2001-10-10 00:00
> UTC.  grr.  8-)
> 
> 

Please follow

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-09/msg00268.html

We may take about the same problem. Where were you when we were
discussing it :-(?



H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]