This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PATCH: Fix linkonce for ELF/PPC.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:04:55PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 09:58:26PM -0800, H . J . Lu wrote:
> >
> > I don't know how it happens on ELF/PPC. The problem can be in linker,
> > gcc and glibc. What I saw was the gcc couldn't catch the exception with
> > libstdc++.so built by the current ld. It just aborted. Also see
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-09/msg01248.html
> >
> > It may or may not be related. Feel to find a real fix for the problem.
> > But we still need a workaround in the meantime.
>
> Hmm, considering the above post and Geoff Keating's previous remarks
> (http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-06/msg00413.html) about
FWIW, binutils 2.11.92.0.10 seems ok with static libstdc++.a in gcc
3.1.
> requiring zeros, I can't see how we can implement a correct solution
> in binutils. It seems to me that this is a gcc bug, and we shouldn't
> be tweaking binutils at all.
It is ok with me as long as we all agree it is a gcc bug.
Franz, do you have any problems with the current Linux/PPC gcc and
binutils 2.11.92.0.10? If not, please report it as a gcc 3.x bug.
H.J.