This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Release 2.12

To: Eric Christopher <echristo at twigboy dot cygnus dot com>
Subject: Re: Release 2.12
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 08:41:25 -0700
Cc: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>,David O'Brien <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>,Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <20011025120041.C1037@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0110242146390.10864-100000@twigboy.cygnus.com>

On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 09:47:39PM -0700, Eric Christopher wrote:
> > Addressing the technical side of this question, I'd say that we need
> > a freeze on new features to let the tree stabilise before branching.
> > eg. some of my recent commits broke various things, and I've had reports
> > that ppc embedded targets are broken due to mrg's recent commit.
> 
> Right.  I agree as well.  MIPS is currently broken as well. I took a look
> at the problem and couldn't track it down within a couple of days. I'm
> going to have the person who submitted the original patch look at it and
> then either back it out or fix the bugs. This will be in no earlier than
> Monday.

Linux/MIPS seems ok to me. I even rebuilt my mips port of RedHat 7.1 with
binutils on 20011021. I don't see any problems.


H.J.

References:
- Re: Release 2.12
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: Release 2.12
  - From: Eric Christopher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]