This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PATCH: binutils + i18n
- To: haible at ilog dot fr
- Subject: Re: PATCH: binutils + i18n
- From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2001 15:23:56 -0700
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <20010918223923.A20929@lucon.org> <20010919115352.A1167@lucon.org>
On Wed, Sep 19, 2001 at 11:53:52AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:39:23PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 09:22:25AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > > Here is a new patch. If there is no objection by next Tuesday, I
> > > suggest we check it in. I will test it thoroughly on Linux under
> > > LANG="en_US" by rebuilding a complete, working Linux/x86 and
> > > Linux/mips.
> > >
> >
> > FYI, since there were no objections, I checked it in. I tested the
>
gas/config/tc-arm.c still uses isdigit:
# grep isdigit *.?
tc-arm.c: if (!isdigit (*str) && *str != '-')
tc-arm.c: for (imm = 0; *str && isdigit (*str); ++str)
tc-arm.c: if (!isdigit (*p))
tc-arm.c: for (offset = 0; *p && isdigit (*p); ++p)
Is that intentional?
H.J.