This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: binutils patches for Cirrus/arm9e/maverick support
- To: philb at gnu dot org
- Subject: Re: binutils patches for Cirrus/arm9e/maverick support
- From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
- Date: 09 Oct 2001 13:18:55 -0400
- Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>, binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- References: <E15r0Mb-00004l-00@kc.cam.armlinux.org>
On Tue, 2001-10-09 at 13:08, philb@gnu.org wrote:
> In message <m3wv246b8t.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>, Nick Clifton
> writes:
> >Anyway Maverick is a much better name, so I suggest that other than
> >for backwrds compatibility, we use "Maverick" instead of "arm9e" in the
> >future. Agreed ?
>
> Good plan. Not only is "Maverick" far cooler-sounding than "arm9e", it
> seems less likely to be confused with ARM's own ARM9E product family.
>
so what do you all suggest for the triplet?
armmaverick-elf?
arm9maverick-elf?
> p.
--
Aldy Hernandez E-mail: aldyh@redhat.com
Professional Gypsy on a [broken] Motorcycle
Red Hat, Inc.