This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: libiberty docs are in
> > It is not built by default; do "make info" or "make dvi" to build
> > it.
>
> Can we please have this annoyance go away?
It is only temporary. In case there were bugs, I didn't want to
burden everyone all at once. When it's proven stable, I'll add it to
the default rules.
> > Please
> > report any problems to me (and the usual places, of course ;)
>
> I hope the CC list in your original message lists all the ``usual
> places'' I need to send this to.
Yup. I've put a query in to find out what the approved canonical
address should be, too.
> Isn't it better to use "@set thedate SOMETHING", and then just use
> @value{thedate} in all the places?
Yup.
> I don't recommend using the full @node lines, like this:
>
> @node Using,Overview,Top,Top
I couldn't get the auto-node logic to work right in all places. If
you can, that's good!
> This excerpt from functions.texi has a typo in the last line, but
> bsearch.c in the CVS already has the typo fixed. Did you forget to
> regenerate functions.texi?
Probably.
> Patches to *.texi (or, where appropriate, to the *.c sources) follow.
>
> [Repeat after me: "it's ``occurrence'', not ``occurance'' ;-) May I
> suggest "M-x ispell-comments-and-strings RET"?]
You may, but I was happy to get what was available in place... :-)
> Index: src/libiberty/libiberty.texi
Changelog entry?