This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Generating Makefile.in (opcodes)
- To: Peter dot Targett at arccores dot com
- Subject: Re: Generating Makefile.in (opcodes)
- From: Phil Blundell <pb at nexus dot co dot uk>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 11:24:48 +0100
- cc: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- References: <OF5EC5C620.26CC9558-ON80256ACD.0032B0AC@risccores.com>
>I've modified opcodes/Makefile.am and re-generated opcodes/Makefile.in for a
>w.i.p port but every time I do a cvs update and a merge takes place to a new
>checked-in version of Makefile.in I have conflicts. Looking at the problem it
>seems that HFILES =..., CFILES =... are transformed into a one line list in my
>Makefile.in where as the checked-in version has them as Makefile.am. I've
>followed the exact style/guidelines in Makefile.am for adding files to HFILES
>etc..
This is pretty much an occupational hazard. Different versions of the
autotools do this kind of thing slightly differently. Unless you and the
person checking in have precisely the same automake and autoconf, conflicts
are almost inevitable.
p.