This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Possible ARM binutils/gcc errors...

To: Philip Blundell <philb at gnu dot org>
Subject: Re: Possible ARM binutils/gcc errors...
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux at arm dot linux dot org dot uk>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 22:07:16 +0100
Cc: "Steven J. Hill" <sjhill at cotw dot com>, linux-arm at lists dot arm dot linux dot org dot uk, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <3B61AD6C.B2E311CF@cotw.com> <E15QDyu-0000IZ-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org> <3B62BC04.12461B99@cotw.com> <20010728150543.A12909@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> <E15QZHN-0001Ie-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org>

On Sat, Jul 28, 2001 at 07:57:37PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> >(I don't really understand why the GCC people don't build a soft-float and
> >non-soft-float version of libgcc.a.  
> 
> Send code, not words.

At 6 hours build time, I'm not in the least bit interested in hacking any
part of GCC.  I've got better things to do with my time, thanks.

References:
- Possible ARM binutils/gcc errors...
  - From: Steven J. Hill
- Re: Possible ARM binutils/gcc errors...
  - From: Philip Blundell
- Re: Possible ARM binutils/gcc errors...
  - From: Steven J. Hill
- Re: Possible ARM binutils/gcc errors...
  - From: Russell King - ARM Linux
- Re: Possible ARM binutils/gcc errors...
  - From: Philip Blundell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]