This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'

To: Nick Clifton <nickc at cambridge dot redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
From: Philip Blundell <philb at gnu dot org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:06:20 +0100
Cc: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <20010709163642.A41697@dragon.nuxi.com> <200107092348.TAA00864@envy.delorie.com> <20010709170916.D41989@dragon.nuxi.com> <200107100030.UAA01223@envy.delorie.com> <m38zhxqd7t.fsf@north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com>

>A good idea.  How about something like this:

This seems fine.  No, there is no need for maintainers to ask me before 
checking patches in, if they're confident that the change is appropriate.

p.

PGP signature

References:
- [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
  - From: David O'Brien
- Re: [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
  - From: David O'Brien
- Re: [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: [PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
  - From: Nick Clifton

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]