This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: PATCH for i386: --no-copy-relocs

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
Subject: Re: PATCH for i386: --no-copy-relocs
From: "Jose Luu" <jluu at mainsoft dot com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 22:35:46 +0200
References: <002101c0f82c$935bf2a0$18671ed4@fr.mainsoft.com> <si3d8xe0ev.fsf@daffy.airs.com> <20010619083710.A16422@lucon.org> <sibsnj7h0k.fsf@daffy.airs.com> <20010621120541.A3008@lucon.org>


> H . J . Lu wrote:
>
>
> I see. So if the main executable is compiled with PIC, should the
> linker still generate the COPY reloc?
>

This is the Solaris logic, when the main executable is compiled with pic,
COPY relocs are avoided.

Jose

References:
- PATCH for i386: --no-copy-relocs
  - From: Jose Luu
- Re: PATCH for i386: --no-copy-relocs
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PATCH for i386: --no-copy-relocs
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: PATCH for i386: --no-copy-relocs
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: PATCH for i386: --no-copy-relocs
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]