This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: failures on sparc-linux

To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Subject: Re: failures on sparc-linux
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:05:13 +0200
Cc: Philip Blundell <pb at nexus dot co dot uk>, Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
References: <hovgm0d06x.fsf@gee.suse.de> <20010613081805.B9739@lucon.org> <hjl@lucon.org> <E15AD2j-00037f-00@mill.nexus.co.uk> <20010613100559.A11661@lucon.org>
Reply-To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Wed, Jun 13, 2001 at 10:05:59AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> Not all targets support "load offset" or DSOs without PIC.

But sparc-linux should support DSOs without PIC.
Dunno what you mean by "load offset", is it non-zero p_vaddr of first
PT_LOAD segment?

	Jakub

Follow-Ups:
- Re: failures on sparc-linux
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- failures on sparc-linux
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: failures on sparc-linux
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: failures on sparc-linux
  - From: Philip Blundell
- Re: failures on sparc-linux
  - From: H . J . Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]