This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: static shared library vs static linking
- To: koundinya at teil dot soft dot net
- Subject: Re: static shared library vs static linking
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at zembu dot com>
- Date: 21 Feb 2001 23:18:47 -0800
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, squalls_tang at 263 dot net
- References: <200102220651.MAA02898@graf.teil.soft.net>
koundinya@teil.soft.net writes:
> With Static Shared libraries, symbols are still bound to
> addresses at link time,
> but library code is not bound to the executable until run time.
Thanks. That is what is used on SVR3. I usually just call them COFF
shared libraries.
They are a real pain to work with, which is they the technology was
abandoned in favor of ELF.
Ian