This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: assembler syntax: low(sym) vs. sym@l
- To: greg at mcgary dot org
- Subject: Re: assembler syntax: low(sym) vs. sym@l
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2001 09:30:58 -0500
- CC: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- References: <200101260528.WAA05872@kayak.mcgary.org>
> I need to choose a syntax for a new gas port. Is there a substantial
> reason (i.e., other than aesthetics) for choosing one over the other?
> I'll likely go with @xx suffixes if there's no good reason to prefer
> the other notation.
Note that '@' is a valid (in fact, mandatory) character in symbol
names for PE targets (like Windows CE).