This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: A symbol version patch for glibc 2.x compatibility
- To: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>
- Subject: Re: A symbol version patch for glibc 2.x compatibility
- From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at FreeBSD dot org>
- Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2000 03:53:32 -0800
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
- Organization: The NUXI BSD group
- References: <20001111234523.A28829@valinux.com>
- Reply-To: obrien at FreeBSD dot org
> I don't understand why David kept asking for Linux to change.
Because I'd like to follow something written down in a specification or
standard.
What should be the standard for using this PT_NOTE section method? Linux
names the section ".note.ABI-tag", NetBSD ".note.ident". I made FreeBSD
follow Linux with ".note.ABI-tag". Or does one search thru all the
PT_NOTE type sections looking for a type of 0x01? Search all the PT_NOTE
sections looking for a name string you recognize?
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)