This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: Patch to handle gnat_demangling

To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
Subject: Re: Patch to handle gnat_demangling
From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl at valinux dot com>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2000 17:12:38 -0800
Cc: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
References: <20001121091551.A4198@valinux.com> <Pine.BSF.4.10.10011212004340.2571-100000@dair.pair.com>

On Tue, Nov 21, 2000 at 08:09:18PM -0500, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > Since Ada (gnat) is supported now, should we handle it in main ()?
> 
> I would think so. :-)
> 
> If you have bootstrapped and tested GCC with this patch, then please
> commit it to gcc and src.
> 

It is ok with binutils. But I haven't tried with gcc. Also I haven't
set up my CVS tree to check changes into gcc.


-- 
H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Patch to handle gnat_demangling
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

References:
- Patch to handle gnat_demangling
  - From: H . J . Lu
- Re: Patch to handle gnat_demangling
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]