Re: A patch for ltmain.sh

["H . J . Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>]

On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 03:44:48AM -0200, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Oct  8, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@valinux.com> wrote:
> 
> > I think we can ignore the messages from relink. If there is a real
> > problem, we will see in the normal link.  I can image the messages from
> > relink may be useful for libtool developers. But I certainly don't
> > want to see them in "make check". Here is a patch.
> 
> It's actually supposed to be useful for libtool users, in case the
> wrapper script fails to relink the executable for no apparent reason.
> I'd rather see the output redirected to a temporary file and displayed
> along with the relink command in case it fails, and discarded
> otherwise.
> 
> In any case, ltmain.sh is a generated file.  It's ltmain.in you want
> to change, and patches should go to libtool-patches@gnu.org.  Thanks!
> 
> (Which doesn't mean I'm discarding your patch; I'll keep it handy and
> check in it in my next slot of time devoted to libtool, unless you've
> come up with something along the lines I suggest above :-)

I am too busy now. I will wait for the new one.


H.J.