This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: $(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Subject: Re: $(build_tooldir)/lib (was Re: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2000-05/msg01104.html)
- From: Jim Wilson <wilson at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 17:41:50 -0700
- cc: Geoff Keating <geoffk at cygnus dot com>, hjl at lucon dot org, aoliva at cygnus dot com, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
Hmm. Then why did we need build_tooldir in the first place? Alexandre?
If you are doing a one-source build like we do, then you don't need
build_tooldir. If you build and install binutils first, then you probably
need build_tooldir so that the cross gcc can find the cross as, etc.
The creation of the libsubdir directories in the stmp-fixinc rule probably
doesn't happen soon enough to avoid this problem. On the other hand, if we
do have the -B/-L/-I options, then we don't need the stuff in the stmp-fixinc
rule anymore, and you don't have to worry about ordering problems, so that
may make the Makefile dependencies simpler.
Jim