This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
[EFifer@sanwaint.com: RE: binutils prerelease available for testing (feedback needed)]
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Subject: [EFifer@sanwaint.com: RE: binutils prerelease available for testing (feedback needed)]
- From: DJ Delorie <dj at delorie dot com>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:15:08 -0400
- CC: nickc at cygnus dot com
Can I revert this patch and put it back on the discussion block?
------- Start of forwarded message -------
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
From: "Fifer, Eric" <EFifer@sanwaint.com>
To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Subject: RE: binutils prerelease available for testing (feedback needed)
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 18:46:40 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Danny Smith wrote:
>But, rebuilding binutils-000718 after reverting the changes made to
>gas/config/obj_coff.c
>(http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2000-07/msg00226.html) back to
>binutils-000717 version, I can successfully build and link against dlls,
>using either dllwrap or gcc -shared.
Yes, rebuilding binutils-20000718-1 with the patch you mention
reversed out, clears up the problems I'm seeing.
Thanks,
Eric Fifer
- --
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
------- End of forwarded message -------