This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96

To: Philip Blundell <Philip dot Blundell at pobox dot com>
Subject: Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at NUXI dot com>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 15:22:43 -0700
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
References: <200005221125.NAA08926@hawking.suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.21.0005222140360.25257-100000@front.linuxcare.com.au> <20000522114555.B87257@dragon.nuxi.com> <obrien@NUXI.com> <E12tzRZ-0000dr-00@kings-cross.london.uk.eu.org>
Reply-To: obrien at NUXI dot com

On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 10:08:57PM +0100, Philip Blundell wrote:
> Alan, please go ahead and check this in to the branch if you are happy that 
> the patch is correct.  I plan to make a first 2.10 release candidate tarball 
> tomorrow.

I may be wrong, but it seems `ld' on the 2.10 branch reports itself as
version 2.9.5.  As does `as' and bfd.
 
-- 
-- David    (obrien@NUXI.com)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96
  - From: Philip Blundell

References:
- Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96
  - From: David O'Brien
- Re: A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96
  - From: Philip Blundell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]