This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: ld test failure on ARM GNU/Linux

To: rth at cygnus dot com
Subject: Re: ld test failure on ARM GNU/Linux
From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at zembu dot com>
Date: 10 Apr 2000 18:43:12 -0700
CC: Philip dot Blundell at pobox dot com, binutils at sourceware dot cygnus dot com, alan at linuxcare dot com dot au
References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0004101328310.4828-100000@front.linuxcare.com.au> <20000410213215.19692.qmail@daffy.airs.com> <20000410163805.A29565@cygnus.com>

   Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2000 16:38:05 -0700
   From: Richard Henderson <rth@cygnus.com>

   > Richard, you
   > wrote this code in the first place; what would you expect to happen
   > with the ld/testsuite/ld-selective/3.cc code?

   As documented in the "keep" and "lose" comments in the test case.
   I don't believe there are any symbols not mentioned in the comments.

Then the testsuite does not match the test case, and selective.exp
should be fixed.  And the test will presumably start failing when
using gcc 2.95.2 on i386 GNU/Linux.

Ian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ld test failure on ARM GNU/Linux
  - From: Catherine Moore
- Re: ld test failure on ARM GNU/Linux
  - From: Alan Modra

References:
- Re: ld test failure on ARM GNU/Linux
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: ld test failure on ARM GNU/Linux
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: ld test failure on ARM GNU/Linux
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]