This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the Archer project.
Re: [Archer] Re: [Archer] Stop the Insanity! Linespec Rewrite
Sorry for the delay in answering this...
> I have a patch to fix this. Thank you for bringing this to my
> attention (and adding tests for it). Your new operator_bps.exp
> passes 100% on archer-keiths-linespec-rewrite. [I haven't pushed the
> patch yet.]
> > . Our testsuite spotted a couple of crashes. They might be related
> > to the crash that Tom mentioned, although I kind of doubt it.
> > Nevertheless, I'll investigate them after you've looked at Tom's
> > report, just in case they end up having the same cause.
> If you can tell me how to reproduce, I will take a look. There are
> probably lots of gotchas all over the place. I relied heavily (too
> much?) on the test suite. I wonder what bugs Go, D, and other
> languages might expose.
OK. I have added two new testcases:
* gdb.ada/bp_enum_homonym.exp: The testcase inserts a breakpoint
using a function name ("archive"), but that name is also used
as the name of one of the enumerals in an enumerated type.
* gdb.ada/bp_on_var.exp: The testcase attempts to insert some
breakpoints using variable names. The breakpoints should be
If you'd like me to take a look and tell you what's going on, I'd be
more than happy to...